Wednesday, April 25, 2012

HI CUZ 89


My great grandparents, Thomas (ne Wroe) and Mary Ellen Meagher Rowe – their family:

William Joseph, b at sea on "Josephus" 6 June 1853
Margaret, b Hancock Court, Portland 1856; died 22 Nov 1858 @ 2
Catherine Meagher, b 13 Dec 1858; died ???
Elizabeth, b Monument St, Portland 1860; d 25 Sep 1863 @ 3
Thomas Meagher, b 10 Feb 1863; d 7 May 1927
Mary, b 2 May 1865, d  ??? - Anna M. Rowe married John E. McBrady
Jane (Jenny), b 7 Sep 1867; died ???  married Frank M. Emery
Elizabeth, b 29 Dec 1871; died ???  never married.

There were a total of eleven children in the William Joseph and Catherine Ellen Rowe family, though a number never reached maturity. They were:

Nellie Mary Rowe, born 2 Sep 1878; died 26 Nov 1879 @ 1
Mary Ellen Rowe, born 20 Nov 1879; died 21 Aug 1885 @ 6
William Thomas Rowe, MD, born 15 Sep 1881; died 5 May 1955
John Henry Rowe, born 29 July 1883; died 12 Apr 1956
Edward Shannon Rowe, born 8 Aug 1885; died 4 Apr 1886 @ 1
Edwin Leonard Rowe, born 20 Jan 1887; died 9 Aug 1941 @ 54
Francis Stephen Rowe, born 26 Dec 1888; died 11 Apr 1921 @ 33
Joseph William Rowe, born 2 Apr 1891; died
Daniel Mannix Rowe, MD, born 14 Jun 1893; died 2 Sep 1965
Alice Josephine Rowe, born 3 Mar 1896; died 28 Aug 1981
Thomas Lipton Rowe, born 23 Oct 1899; died 8 Jul 1915 @ 15

Homes to remember and visit – try to find them using Google Earth

A - 45 Waterville street from ??  to 1909 (Thomas Lipton Rowe born there; Grampa Willie died there in 1909; Great Grampa John Shanaghan died there in 1901)

B - 40 Monument Street, where Thomas and Mary Ellen lived through about

C - 36 Vespers Street (where Uncle Edwin Leonard later lived), one had a grocery store
downstairs.

D - 54 Adams Street, where Great Grampa Thomas lived at his death in 1892 and Great Gramma Mary Ellen in 1902.

E - in 1882 - Willie and Kate lived @ 48 Adams, w/ boarders John and E.H. O'Brian; Thomas and Thomas H. Rowe @ 74 Adams (or 17 Newberry St); John Edward McBrady, sheet iron worker @ 74 Adams.

All these houses are within several blocks on Munjoy Hill near Portland's Eastern Promenade (overlooking Casco Bay and Chebeague Island). John Edward McBrady, per Eleanore (Rowe) Tomusko lived on corner of Sheridan and Congress streets.

MLFHS: Researching Irish ancestors
I don't know if anyone else has picked up on your query.  I know how difficult it can be to research Irish ancestors.  I would suggest you start with http://www.rootsireland.ie.  It may point you in the right direction. If you know which part of Manchester they were in, their local Catholic Parish Church may be one of those BMD's have come on to the MLFHS toolbar.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SURNAME Research server sites - Those O’Connor’s, Sullivan’s, and Shanahan (Shannon’s) researching your roots might want to “subscribe” to the following free sites:
Sullivan-1-request@rootsweb.com_   Oconnor-1-request@rootsweb.comwww.geocities.com/Heartline/Hills/5600_ For the first two sites, send the message SUBSCRIBE – and no other words, just subscribe. I have not tried these sites, as the other two I subscribe to now yield over100 messages a day. I am also not certain whether “cousins” will be on these sites (not close ones in any case); there may be cousins there, I just can’t guarantee it. To each of these sites you might want to send a simple note explaining/outlining your family tree, and asking for cousins to respond; this is done by sending the note, in the first case to oconnor-1@rootsweb.com_ and in the second case to sullivan-1@rootsweb.com_.  Shanahan/Shannon researchers look for instructions at the website homepage. 

Other surnames can beresearched by checking the “surname list” on Cyndi’s list www.cyndislist.com/surnames.html   . 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Research aids –
The place and time might be different, but these sorts of investigative aids may help you find one of your ancestors.

Death certificate – may provide the names of wife, parents, an address
Obituary – The date may come from the above – and might name
Cemetery – may include cause of death, siblings and an address
            Church records – may yield an address, other family member names
            Naturalization records – may yield data as to birthplace, date of arrival
            Passenger Arrival Records – ship on which traveled, possible companions
            City Directories- would show trade, union membership, work place.

What do we tell each other – A fellow genealogist in a casual conversation asked how and what I decide to share of family data I uncover. Most of you are quite honestly  only casually interested in most of the family data I uncover or which is shared with me; there are only a few whose interest in family history is deep and continuing (or you could say an obsession). That is not in any way a put down, merely an observation. I told him I share whatever is given me (unless restrictions are placed on its distribution by the source) or its being shared would cause controversy. I also require that the information not be used in any way which would distort or show disrespect for the religious beliefs, whatever they were or were not, of ancestors/family. I try not to share addresses anymore without asking. Other than these limits, I share everything, given time.

HICUZ 35 – (extract)

“Noble O’Connors” – Third cousin Carroll O’Connor wrote recently and shared an important and oft overlooked bit of family lore. It seems that the O’Connors of our collective family are known as the”noble O’Connors. Various reasons have been presented, and may each hold the ultimate reason. My mother used to tell me we are descended from one of the High Kings of Ireland. Another reason I’ve heard is that at a church fire one ancestor ran in and saved the host, thus earning the appellation “noble.” Another plausible story is the one Carroll O’Connor told me. After visiting cousins in Ireland he was told by male O’Connor cousins that the term came from being strong, brave, and hard to defeat in battle. The female O’Connor cousins told a different story; they said it was because we males were”so damn good looking.” Carroll says we should agree with the women’s rationale, as one can easily verify this theory by looking in a mirror. Carroll also shared that our ancestors used to fish for salmon at night in the Feale River, so as not to be caught and have their fish taken.

O’Conor Don Sept - Found on the INTERNET, at the following site, www.knightlyorders.org/oconor.html several pages of general history of O’Conor Don (brown-haired) and at www.knightlyorders.org/comp.html . It turns out that the last two High Kings of Ireland were Ua Conchobair (O’Connor or O'Conor); Turlough Mor O’Conor ruled for 30 years until his death in 1156, and his son Ruaidri (Roderick) or Ruiri (Rory) O’Conor who succeeded his father and ruled through 1198. Both were also separately Kings of Connacht. Perhaps this is the historical connection to the term “noble.”  The current holder of the title O’Conor Don is Denis Armar O’Conor Don, who lives in Dun Laoghaire near Dublin with his wife Rosemary. I invite your review of those webpages and their story of the leader of the O’Conor Sept.


Recently saw an article sent by a cousin of a cousin in South Africa, noting that the O’Conor Don Sept (of Roscommon) centuries ago had split into several separate septs, two originally designated by the color of their respective leaders’ hair (Red (Ruadh or Roe) and Brown (Anglicized version is Don)). One Sept became predominantly Protestant, while the other remained Catholic; this does not alter or diminish family connections (should we ever get back that far).  I mention this, and the fact that several of an ancestors’ son became Royal Irish Constables (RIC) as in no way demeaning or denigrating their ties or character. Their descendants are family.


HICUZ 42 – (extract)
O’Conor Don Sept – From fourth cousin Clare, a tidbit that may be of interest. It seems that the Dun Laoghaire (port for Dublin) Genealogical Society is (was once) offering for sale illustrated copies of the family tree (though probably only his direct line) of Denis Armar O’Conor Don, current head of that sept, and thus symbolic Prince of Connacht. It traces his ancestry from 75 AD to the current date, noting worldwide events to show what was happening in certain eras. It may be of interest, because if we collectively can trace O’Connor ancestry to a time and place coincident with his lineage, it lets us use his tree as a stepping stone to more ancient times. This is the primary reason one hopes to find royal blood, since it ties into better documentation. The tree can be obtained for nine Irish pounds from: Hon. Secretary, DLGS, 11Desmond Avenue, Dun Laoghaire, Dublin, Ireland. Check out www.dun-laoghaire.com/genealogy/ . Thanks Clare.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

HICUZ 40 – (extract)
These newsletters are copyrighted because they involve considerable effort, time, expense, and family data. I ask that you not send any newsletter to ANY website or group, no matter how family-oriented or innocuous they may seem, without asking. This is a matter of respect for beliefs of our ancestors, which you are asked to respect.

Our ancestors collectively held many beliefs, some were Christians (of many faiths, sects, et cetera), some Jews, and some of other beliefs. No matter what those beliefs were, they are and remain a fact of history. Whether we, you or I, disagree with those beliefs may be a separate issue. Some people, however, distort the fact of those beliefs by converting those ancestors to their own belief system after the fact (of years or even centuries). As an historian I have an issue with revisionism, and personally see it as a gross insult to those beliefs and those currently holding those beliefs (no matter what they were).

Some genealogy websites and organizations serve to facilitate that distortion, which requires accumulation of extensive, detailed family data. Because of this I include a copyright, and a caution (see REMINDER at top of this newsletter) that the data in the newsletters not be subjected to this process. PLEASE DO NOT POST ANY newsletters on any website without my permission.

If any cousin does this, they will be breaching a family trust.

Griffith’s Valuation site – Try the following website (I don’t have the time right now) –
http://www.geocities.com/athens/parthenon/6108/grifintr.htm  . The Irish Valuation Office, 6 Ely Place, Dublin 2, Ireland has records relating to land ownership, and its holdings include Cancelled Land Books, Current Land Books, from the time of GV to the present. These records note the names of occupants, the lessors, and land values. Its primary documents are the original Griffith’s Valuation books, three in number: the field books, the house books, and the tenure books. The field book has info on the size and quality of a house; house books contain the occupant’s name and measurements of any building; the tenure books contain the annual rent paid and legal basis (by lease or will) and the year of the lease. In the latter part of the 19th and early part of the 20th century, people were able to buy the land they had farmed. Changes to the original GV were noted in the margins of the Cancelled Books, and the Current Land Books. These books are priceless to researchers since, though censuses were taken in 1821, 1831, 1841, 1851, 1861, 1871, and 1901, and 1911, most records prior to 1901 were destroyed. Copies of GV are available (some with indexes) on CD-ROMs. A website which includes many articles on Irish records, and Limerick County local history, can be subscribed to by sending an e-mail to  IRL-LIMERICK-D-request@rootsweb.com  ; in the body of your e-mail print boldly   SUBSCRIBE IRL-LIMERICK-D-request@rootsweb.com  .
HI CUZ 41 – extracts –

Irish Land Records – an overview


 Irish Tithe Applotment BooksQuote: Tithes were an income tax on farming, usually about one tenth of the annual income. These were used for the upkeep of the Church of Ireland and were paid from the time of the Reformation.  Before the Composition Act of 1823 it was possible to pay them in kind in stead of money.  From the time of the Composition Act they were supposed to be paid in cash….and Tithe surveys were carried out in each Parish to assess what the income for that parish would be.  Two people were appointed by each parish to carry out this assessment.

Catholics and Protestants alike, in England, Scotland, Ireland, and Wales, resented this tax. Tax was not payable on all land, and there was even variation on the types of land from place to place. From 1736 grazing land had an exemption - this was usually land held by landlords. Certain crops were taxable, others weren’t.  Potatoes could be taxable
in one parish and not in the one next door.

Tithe books were not comprehensive, people who did not hold land are not listed and some types of land were passed over absolutely.  Towns and cities were usually not asssesed. They are arranged by townland and usually give the acreage held by each farmer. However, note here that the measurement used was the plantation or Irish acre which differs in size from the imperial or English acre used in the Griffiths Valuation.

The information you get from the Tithe Books is simple, townland name; landholders name; area of land and tithes paid.  Some will list the landlord's name as well. The original tithe books for the 26 counties of the Republic of Ireland are held in the National Archives in Dublin.  Those for the 6 counties of Northern Ireland were transferred to the Public Records Office of Northern Ireland (PRONI) in Belfast. Copies remain in Dublin in the National Archives and National Library.

Tithe Defaulters: As mentioned above, Catholics and Protestants all objected to paying of Tithes. In 1830 Catholic Parishioners in Graiguenamanagh in Co. Kilkenny withheld
their tithes. In 1832 they were followed by those in most parts of south Leinster and
Munster and violence erupted - The ‘Tithe War’. Church of Ireland Ministers, not enjoying generous pay in any case, therefore ended up without this money during 1831. It was necessary for them to claim assistance from the Clergy Relief Fund to draw up a list of Parishoners who had defaulted on the Tithes. 499 Lists/Schedules of Defaulters were submitted in order to avail of the relief fund.  127 of these lists still exist, but the Lists of Tithe Defaulters is not alphabetical, and it is necessary to go through each book for each county and for some there are a number of books. (Some of these have been produced on CD. (53 of these books relate to Kilkenny; 30 to Tipperary; some coverage of Laois, Carlow, Offaly, Meath, Cork, Kerry, Limerick, Louth Waterford and Wexford).
Quaker records show lists of those who defaulted on Tithes also.

Griffiths Primary Valuation - This tax assessment (valuation) records every landowner  and householder in Ireland in a period shortly after the famine. An Act was passed in 1826 which allowed for a uniform valuation of property in all Ireland for levying of county cess charges and grand Jury Rates. Thus began an assessment of the whole country, county by county by Sir Richard Griffith..

Amendments were passed to the 1826 Act, the first in 1831 excluded those houses under the annual valuation of £3, another in 1836 excluded house under £5. The information in Griffiths includes: the townland address and householders name; the name of the person from whom the property is leased; a description of the property; the acreage and the valuation.

If a surname was common in an area then the Griffith surveyors adopted the practice of  indicating the fathers name to show the difference between two people of the same Christian name and surname….(usually). So Tadgh O’Brien (Michael) is the son of Michael O’Brien and Tadgh O’Brien (James) is the son of James O’Brien. However, in Ireland people of the same name could/can be distinguished simply by indicating the colour of their hair (as gaeilge - thru Irish ) so it would have been sufficient here to indicate that one Tadgh had red hair and one Tadgh black – calling them respectively Tadgh (Red) O’Brien and Tadgh (Black) O’Brien. The main difference between the Tithe Applotment Books and Griffith’s Valuation is that all householders were in Griffiths.

Remember the different types of acres used in each, the Irish and English acre. This will account for difference in size of land held by a family from one valuation to the other if they appear in both.  Remember also that the house of less than £3 annual value were included up to the year 1831 and excluded from that point forward, and those with an annual value of £5 were included up to 1836 and excluded from then on. QUOTE

Many refer to the Griffiths CD, which is handy enough to track a surname through the country…or to find some places in counties where the name occurs.  However, this is a list of names for the county, there is no way of knowing if the six John O’Leary’s listed for one county are one and the same or if all the land is held by John O’Leary and rented out to others. A source – www.familytreemaker.com/ .

One problem noted by researchers is that while the Griffiths Valuation CD was supposed to have been transcribed from the originals - the place names are not as they should be in many instances.  There are place names which while one may know them from the originals - are not the same as actually written in the Griffiths Valuation books.

Another problem is that many GV entries were written by people with little or no knowledge of Irish geography or Irish phonetics. So that while they transcribed what they thought they saw, because of faded ink or poor script - the actual name might be quite different if it was someone with a knowledge of either Irish phonetics or the geography of the area they would have written a different word as the place name.  This is not a huge
error to anyone who knows the geography of the area they are inquiring about, but for anyone who hasn’t a clue, it’s a different story.

There is an index to surnames in the Griffiths Valuation.  The indices are made up by county, divided into baronies, parishes, townlands. There are two sections to an index and some counties have a number of volumes covering the whole county, .e.g. Co. Cork has three.  Each index is divided into two sections, the first being an alphabetical list of
surnames occurring in the area the index covers and the names that occur in each
Barony. The second section is an alphabetical list of surnames occurring in each parish within that barony.  It doesn’t matter if you don’t know which Barony the parish you are looking for is in - you just check through the second section.  It doesn’t matter even if you don’t know the parish you can just check the first section to see where the name occurred in a county. The index to the surnames tells you how many times a surname occurred in a particular parish and whether or not that surname also occurred in the
Tithe books.  It does not give you any more information.

The Householders Index with their FHC film numbers:
Antrim Armagh, Carlow, Cavan - film # 0919001
Clare, Cork, Londonderry - film # 0919002

Donegal, Down Dublin - Film # 0919003

Fermanagh, Galway, Kerry, Kildare, Kilkeny - film # 0919004
Laois, Leitrim, Limerick, Longford, Louth, Mayo, Meath - film # 0919005
Monaghan, Offaly, Roscommon, Sligo, Tipperary - film # 09119006
Tyrone, Waterford, Westmeath, Wexford, Wicklow - film #  0919007
_
Valuation Office Records - The Valuation office was set up to carry out the original Primary Valuation. It is still in existance and has in its possession the original set of
notebooks used by the Griffiths Valuation surveyors  These are the field books, the house books and the tenure books.  All 3 have maps which indicate the holding they refer to.

Field Books: Information on the size & quality of a holding
House Books: Occupiers name and measurement of any buildings
Tenure Books: Annual rent paid and legal basis - whether by lease or at will, also the year of any lease.

These notebooks also document any changes in occupation between the initial survey and the final published survey.

The valuation office also holds the ‘Cancelled’ or ‘revision’ Land Books and Current Land Books.  The Cancelled land books are similar to those of the published valuation but observations made were handwritten in.  The observations often show whether the size or physical structure of the holding were altered, also the changes in the name of the landlord or occupier….this can suggest death or emigration in a particular year.  Changes may have been noted up to a few years after the actual change. It is best to go to the original earlier years and work your way forward with these because the actual numbers
of lots can have changed over the years because of lots being broken up or joined.

The Land Commission was created by the 1881 Land Act to determine fair rents, but its main purpose became to assist tenants to purchase their property.  A Congested Districts Board was set up in 1891 and this had a similar function, but it was abolished by the Irish Govt. in 1923 and its powers transferred to the Land Commission.

So, in the latter part of the 19th C and the early part of the 20th C people who occupied land in Ireland were able to buy that land.  You will see an entry in the cancelled books showing (In Fee) meaning that the occupier was now the owner. Also, on these you may see LAP - Land Act Purchase stamped on an entry, meaning the occupier had been assisted in by the Lands Commission to purchase the land.

The cancelled books for the 26 counties are held in Dublin in the Valuation Office while those for the 6 counties of Northern Ireland are held in the PRONI in Belfast. Those in Dublin are bound together by year in large volumes, the oldest being at the back (oldest = Griffiths). Those in Belfast are not bound and have to be asked for separately and are only available up to the 1930’s. The related maps are also held in the Valuation Office. These are Ordnance Survey Sheets onto which the property boundaries were drawn.  Changes in holdings are also indicated on the maps UNQUOTE - Source: Limerick Daily Digest, V99, #94.  Provided by a very helpful cousin.

Local research - Many of the above films can be temporarily obtained at a local Mormon Family History Center (FHC) and examined leisurely during their research hours.

Wills If you can get to them, they may contain priceless information about family members and may show how family members get along (or don’t). Wills are most important because of the family relationships stated. With my O’Connor ancestors a will was not probable. After the 1690 Battle of the Boyne which saw King James’ Catholic supporters in Ireland (and separately in England, Scotland, and in France) lose to Protestant forces, Catholics throughout the British Isles were restricted by the Penal Laws, which reduced their political, religious, and economic freedoms significantly. In contrast to the situation above of my Wroe ancestors probably “owning” land near Manchester, my O’Connor ancestors in Ireland most likely under the Penal Laws had to try to retain control of their lands by leasing them from new landlords. In Germany, Nancy’s Protestant ancestors were suffering the opposite fate, being driven out by Catholic repression. On the Scottish isle of Eigg Nancy’s ancestors were most likely on both ends of the spectrum.

Wills drawn up by Catholics in Ireland in that period, or until the end of Penal Law restrictions, would have been unthinkable, as they would have invited instant identification and loss of property under the laws of the time. Life was not very fair or tolerant in those times. Some were even “transported” for their crimes.

Transportation – Recently reread an excellent book on this subject, Robert Hughes “The Fatal Shore, The Epic of Australia’s Founding”, Alfred A. Knopf, New York, 1987. It references another excellent source, “The Convict Settlers of Australia, Lloyd L. Robson. Hughes’ book is excellently written, thoroughly documented, and balanced in its discussions, which offer a rare, objective view of life in the late1700s and 1800s in the British Isles and Australia. Transportation was, in essence, the scheme to ship criminals and undesirables far away, in the case of this book from the British Isles to Australia. In other cases though, Canadian revolutionaries of the 1830s and 1840s were shipped to Australia, and before the American Revolutionary War, undesirables were shipped to the American colonies, especially the southern colonies. Jails were not what society did with criminals of the time, and only in the 1820s did England, under reforms by Sir Robert Peel, institute a modern police force. Previously England used transportation as the method to house criminals, until jails became the accepted practice.

Fatal Shore – The real benefit of this book is that it dispels some misconceptions about transportation, based on examination of records of the time. The vast majority of those transported were individuals we today would most probably also want shipped somewhere else. Transportation to Australia occurred in four phases, 1787 to 1810 (about 9300 males, 2500 females), 1811 to 1830 (large increase in numbers), 1831 to 1840 (43,500 males, 7700 females), and after 1840 (while only nine years, “more than two previous decades before”); transportation only ended as a practice in 1868, as the penal system shifted to imprisonment. The increased numbers of those transported just after 1831 reflected a new phenomenon in British urban areas, when police, better law enforcement and a better system of transport facilitated the steep increase.

 L.L. Robson’s survey of the entire period, analyzing a significant sample of those transported, states that 34% were for unspecified larcenies, 15% for burglary/housebreaking, 13% for stealing domestic/farm animals, and 6% for stealing clothes “theft of wearing apparel.” Robson noted that “only a little more than 3 percent of the male convicts went down ‘for offences against the person, which ranged from assault, rape, kidnapping …a meager 4 percent were under sentence for “offences of a public nature, which embraced an assortment of acts thought to undermine the rights or prestige of the Realm – mainly ‘coining and uttering’ bad money (2 percent) followed by another 1.5 percent convicted of treason, conspiring to riot or membership in trade unions or Irish secret societies like the White Boys and Ribbon Men.”

Most of those transported, the vast majority, were English city dwellers, where crime was rampant, quite contrary to the idyllic image of Georgian and Victorian societies. Hughes notes that “in 1797 one in eight Londoners lived by crime.” Irish, Scots, Welsh, and certainly Canadian revolutionaries, trade unionists, and political activists were hardest to capture and furthest from the areas of uppermost concern, English cities, where those in power thought of the masses as little more than an unwelcome, dangerous class competing for what was thought of as too little space.

Hughes’ book, often a commentary more on the social structure of England than on Australia’s first settlers, dispels the widely held view that the “typical convict was an innocent creature who had sinned once and been savagely punished for it.”  Most of those transported served essentially as indentured servants for sheep ranches or on farms. The conditions varied tremendously, with some receiving very humane treatment, others rebelling at horrid conditions. The really criminal element were further transported to smaller penal institutions on islands off Australia’s coast, or to distant areas, where treatment and life was quite brutal.

Indenture, while illegal in the USA today, remains alive with some immigrant groups, and some of our ancestors. My grandmother Bridget Sullivan came to America as an indentured servant.

It is noteworthy that in the late 1830s Canadians in Quebec revolted against English control. Some of those caught were tried and hung; others were transported to Australia.


For those who take life too seriously – “Save the whales … collect the whole set” 
“A day without sunshine is like … night!!”   “ 99 percent of lawyers give the others a bad name”  “ He who laughs last thinks slowest”  “I drive way too fast to worry about cholesterol”  “If Barbie is so popular, why do you have to buy her friends?”  “Support bacteria; it’s the only culture some people have”  “Monday is an awful way to spend 1/7th of your life”  “ Plan to be spontaneous today”  and lastly, for genealogists – “The problem with the gene pool is there is no lifeguard”

Sunday, April 22, 2012

HI CUZ 88

MLFHS: Civil registry marriage record help
My initial 22 March posting asking for help – 22 March 2012
MLFHS: Civil registry marriage record help

All,
I am trying to locate any record of the marriage of my great grandparents, Thomas Wroe (born?8 March?1830 in Manchester, chr 21 March at Manchester Cathedral) to Mary Ellen Meagher, born Ireland 1834. 

Ancestry search has a civil registry notation, reg district Manchester, Lancashire County, Jul-Aug-Sep 1852, Volume 8D and page 637 ... but I have been unable to get to the record. I expect one or more of Thomas' siblings might have been present or a witness. Any details would be most welcome. 

Don Rowe

MLFHS: Civil registry marriage record help

Date: Thursday, March 22, 2012, 8:44 PM
Hi, Don,

Lancashire BMD (www.lancashirebmd.org.uk has the entry -
Lancashire Marriage indexes for the years: 1852
Surname Forename(s) Surname Forename(s) Church / Register Office Registers At Reference   WROE Thomas MOHAR Mary Manchester Register Office or Registrar Attended Manchester MCR_RM/25/23

The surname MOHAR is probably a phonetic rendering of MEAGHER.  This marriage took place either in the Register Office (not very common at that time) or in a non-Anglican chapel.  The latter term includes ALL other chapels, Unitarian, Baptist, Methodist, Catholic, etc.  The only way to access the information on this certificate whether from the GRO or the Manchester RO is the purchase a certified copy of the entry.

Hope this is some help

MLFHS member – name removed (of Bury, in Lancastershire county) 22 March 2012

MLFHS: Civil registry marriage record help – another response

Hi, You wrote -

Both FreeBMD and LancsBMD have Thomas Wroe & Mary Mohar (possible 
mis-transcription of Meagher).

As BOTH FreeBMD (= GRO Index) and LancsBMD (= Manchester RO) have MOHAR, then this is what was recorded at the time in the original Register, and so is not a mis-transcription.  This record will reflect what the Registrar heard and so the bride and groom probably only knew their names as spoken names and not written names.  This spelling sounds the same as the name of boys at school with me who spelt their name MEAGHER.  MAHER is another alternative spelling.  Given a variety of local pronunciations, it could be represented as MAYOR or MAIR.

Hope this helps
Another MLFHS member – name removed - 22 March 2012
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

First cousin once removed Scott Rowe has been doing some fine research using ancestry.com, the US Federal 1930 census, trade directories, and uncovering family and their friends in and around Portland Maine. With the 1940 US census now available lets see what other data springs loose.

For those stalwarts with a detective bent, I recommend joining the Manchester Liverpool Family History Society (MLFHS) as a means to trace our Wroe roots. Another avenue (which I’ve tried again without any response) is to subscribe to a Roots Web bulletin board on Wroes.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WROE/ROWE research -

I just now, 2PM on 4/20/2012, walked out and in the mailbox was (POSSIBLY/PROBABLY) the registered copy of the 15 August 1852 Manchester, county of Lancaster, St. Ann RC Chapel (on Junction Street) marriage of my great grandparents Thomas Wroe and Mary Ellen Meagher. There are a lots of questions and I need your help in analyzing it, as certain bits do not fit.

The document poses monumental ancestral rethinking.

CONFIRMING DATA - There are bits of data which suggest the document does reflect the noted couple are my paternal great grandparents. The first analysis agrees - 
   A) Marriage at a Catholic Church fits with oral tradition of his marrying a Catholic. 
   B ) The timing, going backwards nine months from 6 June 1853 at sea birth of William Joseph Rowe to Sep 1852 puts the marriage/conception in expected time frame.
   C) The wife's name on record is Mary Mohar, which fits phonetically.
   D) His age at 22 fits with other research, but it may not be true. Hers at 20 years (thus her being born in 1832) fits roughly with other data as her being born 1834. His occupation as fitter up was in mechanical trades, so they seems not to weaken argument that this is our Thomas. 
   E) His residence is given as Bradford, which is roughly OK. Hers is given as 23 Canning Street, Manchester - which I'll have to check.
   F) Previous records research has a Thomas Wroe living with his parents Richard and Margaret Wroe in 1851 UK census, agreeing with his Portland, ME death certificate. 
   G) I'm not sure if Thos (Thomas) Unsworth (performer of marriage) is really a civil servant, or is the name of the Priest. I suspect the former. 

QUESTIONABLE DATA - Weakens the case that this was them -
   A)  Her fathers' name is given as Darby Mohar, brick setter, which doesn't agree with her Maine death certificate as her father being Jeremiah Meagher, a farmer in Ireland
   B)  His father is identified here as Thomas Wroe, a grinder in a factory. This disagrees with our Thomas' Maine death certificate which lists his father as Richard Wroe, a weaver. His Maine death certificate also named Margaret Stansfield as his mother.  Richard and Margaret agree with previous research. 

Did they/would they 
   A) Lie as to their respective fathers' names? if so, why?
   B) WHAT ELSE CAN YOU THINK OF?????? to prove or disprove this was them?

What I plan to do over next few weeks
   1)  Try to obtain St Anne's chapel records, as contrasted with these civil records.
   2)  Search available records for a Thomas Wroe, son of Thomas Wroe in same period. If I find them (and I know I will) this doesn't necessarily mean that this record and its NEW ancestry is correct. 
   3) I'll look for Darby Mohar/Maher/Mahir/Meagher and see what I come up with. 
   4) The witnesses are given as John Park and Margaret Barry, but these may be civil servants at Registrar's office, vice Catholic wedding witnesses. I will pursue verification.
5)      Check on location of 23 Canning Street

In respect to above investigation, I emailed archiveslocalstudies@manchester.gov.uk to see if they could assist with research sources -

Friends,
I am looking to obtain a copy of the 19 August 1852 marriage of my paternal great grandparents, Thomas Wroe and Mary Ellen Meagher at St Ann's Chapel/Church. 

Please identify any links or websites which are of assistance.

Thanks, Don Rowe
Response (automated) of Friday, April 20, 2012 3:21 PM

Thank you for your email.

We aim to answer all enquiries within 10 working days. You may find that your enquiry can be answered by one of our FAQs at:

http://www.manchester.gov.uk/faqs/448/archives_and_local_studies

Please note this is an automatic acknowledgement. If you want to contact us again please email 
archiveslocalstudies@manchester.gov.uk

The Manchester Room & County Record Office
e-mail: 
archiveslocalstudies@manchester.gov.uk
web address: 
http://www.manchester.gov.uk/libraries/arls

The Manchester Room@ City Library (Local Studies)
Elliot House,  151 Deansgate, 
Manchester
M3 3WD    0161 234 1979
0161 234 1098 (for microfilm/microfiche bookings)

Greater Manchester County Record Office (with Manchester Archives)
56 Marshall Street,  New Cross,  Manchester
M4 5FU   0161 832 5284

Reply to above request and my response back
--- On Sat, 4/21/12, archiveslocalstudies@manchester.gov.uk <archiveslocalstudies@manchester.gov.uk> wrote:
From: archiveslocalstudies@manchester.gov.uk <archiveslocalstudies@manchester.gov.uk>
Subject: Re: Record of marriage assistance request
To: "Donald Rowe" <rowboatdon@yahoo.com>
Date:
Saturday, April 21, 2012, 11:03 AM


Dear Mr. Rowe, 

Thank you for your email. 
You can order a print from the microfilm from us at: 

http://www.manchester.gov.uk/info/448/archives_and_local_studies/464/church_register_list/4 

Yours sincerely Kevin Bolton 
**********************************************************
The Manchester Room & County Record Office
Follow us on twitter.com/mcrarchives
e-mail: archiveslocalstudies@manchester.gov.uk
web address: http://www.manchester.gov.uk/libraries/arls

The Manchester Room@City Library (Local Studies)
Elliot House
151 Deansgate
Manchester
M3 3WD
0161 234 1979 
0161 234 1098 (for microfilm/microfiche bookings)

Greater Manchester County Record Office (with Manchester Archives)
56 Marshall Street
New Cross
Manchester
M4 5FU
0161 832 5284

NEW - RESEARCH SERVICE. Please see:

http://www.manchester.gov.uk/info/448/archives_and_local_studies/4260/research_service
 

Kevin,
Thanks so much. It turns out these were not my great grandparents. I have and in analyzing the registrar office copy versus other records found they are another couple.
Thanks for your help.
Don Rowe
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The scanned and reassembled copy follows – you may have to display in landscape mode.



----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MLFHS: Catholic Churches in Manchester

I am not familiar with Newton Heath, so I am reluctant to suggest possible churches.  Looking at the current Diocesan Almanac, possible ones may be

St Brigit, Grey Mare Lane (from 1879)
St Anne, Higher Openshaw (from 1849)
St Chad, Cheetham (from 1773)
St Patrick, Livesey Street (from 1832)
St Francis, Gorton Monastery (from 1861)
St Mary, Failsworth (from 1845)

All the Catholic churches of the Diocese of Salford are advised to deposit their old registers in the Lancashire Archives (LA) in Preston.  Almost all the registers for the period you seek have been deposited there, so I would suggest that you browse the on-line Lancashire Archive catalogue at www.lancashire.gov.uk/corporate/web/?siteid=4528&pageid=30843&e=e   Most of the registers the LA holds are available there on film on open access.

In 1940, the Bishop requested parishes to have their registers filmed so that there was a security copy in case the originals were destroyed by bombing.  Most (but not all) Catholic churches had their registers copied from 1870 (or the foundation of the parish if later) and eventually these films were deposited in the Lancashire Archives.  I think that Manchester Central Library had copies of these films.

Hope this helps

Marriage of Thomas Wroe and Mary Mohar 19 August 1852
Disproving them as family
1)      St Ann’s Chapel in Manchester – a check of the church’s website, and using Google maps reveals this church is remote, on the eastern side of Manchester.
2)      Re-examination of the Maine death certificates of Thomas (Wroe) Rowe and Mary Ellen (Meagher) Rowe verifies his father as Richard Rowe and hers as Jeremiah Casey.
It was an exciting rush to examine all the data, but this couple are not my paternal great grandparents. They may be part of the Wroe extended family, so at least they are an expensive addition to the mountain before me.

MLFHS: Researching Irish ancestors
I don't know if anyone else has picked up on your query.  I know how difficult it can be to research Irish ancestors.  I would suggest you start with 
http://www.rootsireland.ie.  It may point you in the right direction. If you know which part of Manchester they were in, their local Catholic Parish Church may be one of those whose BMD's have come on to the MLFHS toolbar.


Cousins relationship chart – courtesy Scott Rowe



A patron at the library today shared a source of digitized old British records. British History On Line offers (fee based membership) copies of quite old documents, some the patron accessed on line were from 1360s. The cost is thirty pounds per year, about $45.00. Check it out at


Additionally he mentioned Google Books as a source of digitized reference documents.

I plan to investigate both sources further (sometime when I have a spare moment).


MLFHS: Non Gen: Digital back-ups impermanent - a word of warning
Coming to this late as usual. There is a most informative article here. 
https://www.familysearch.org/techtips/2011/09/preserving-family-history-records-digitally> It gives information about two formats (JPEG 2000 and PDFA) specially designed for digital archiving and describes a disc, and tests of it, that holds out the prospect of preserving digital records accurately for centuries (literally!). It is all available now.
MLFHS member – name removed 
MLFHS Digest, Vol 87, Issue 41


MLFHS: Non Gen: Digital back-ups impermanent - a word of warning

Thanks for posting the link to the very interesting Family Search article on preserving family history records digitally.  It is a lengthy article and well worth reading.  Naturally with the number of computer experts on MLFHS forum many of the suggestions in the article have already been made here.  Despite that I found a lot that was new to me.  The M-Disc made by Milleniata is described as a breakthrough in archive-grade storage medium with an archival life measured in centuries.  It seems it underwent an accelerated aging test without loss of the stored data.  The only problem I can see will arise in the future with individual family records with any new changes to digital formats.  Who will look after the media refreshment migration i.e. transferring our data and photos to the latest format and, of course, who will do it at the next stage?  The article suggests we prepare our family and posterity for such migration now. Perhaps as someone suggested we can put it in our will? The writer of the article confirms that saving in the cloud is risky both from a storage aspect but also from the danger of hacking.  He suggests that just as today you can buy old gramophone players in order to play old vinyl records, in the future you may well be able to buy old CD/DVD players to play 'old' CD/DVDs in what will then be an old format.  In my opinion this article is well worth reading and it contains lots of useful information and links to freebies for storing and transferring data.
Thanks again    MLFHS member – name removed
----------------------------------------------------


RMS Lucania

The ship on which my mother sailed to America in July 1906. See HICUZ 86

RMS Campania and Lucania were partly financed by the British Admiralty. An agreement was reached was that the Cunard would receive funding from the Government in return for constructing vessels to admiralty specifications. Also, Cunard would have to agree to the condition that the vessels go on the naval reserve list to serve as armed merchant cruisers when required by the government. The construction contracts were awarded to the Fairfield Shipbuilding and Engineering Company, which at the time was one of Britain’s biggest producers of warships. Plans were soon drawn up for a large, twin-screw steamer powered by triple expansion engines, and construction began in 1891, just 43 days after Cunards' order.
The sisters had the largest triple expansion engines ever fitted to a Cunard ship. These engines were also the largest in the world at the time, and still rank today amongst the largest of the type ever constructed. They represent the limits of development for this kind of technology, which was superseded a few years later by turbine technology. In height, the engines reached from the double-bottom floor of the engine room to the top of the superstructure - almost three stories. Each engine had five cylinders. There were two low pressure cylinders on each engine, each measuring 8´2" (2.48 m) in diameter, and they operated with a stoke of 5' 9" (1.75 m). Together, the engines could generate 31,000 ihp (23,000 kW), which produced an average speed of 22 knots (41 km/h), and a record speed of 23½ knots. Normal operating speed for the engines was about 79 rpm. (Note: a modern automobile engine idles at approximately 10 times that speed)
The two engines were each placed in a separate watertight engine compartment; in case of a hull breach in that area, only one engine room would then be flooded, and the ship would still have power to return to port with the adjacent engine. In addition to this Lucania had 16 transverse watertight compartments, which meant that she could remain afloat with any two compartments flooded.
(It is worthy of note, on the hundredth anniversary of the sinking of the Titanic, that its structure was similar – and advertised similar ability to stay afloat. Many WWII US vessels used the same type power plants.)
In their day, Lucania and her sister offered the most luxurious first-class passenger accommodations available. It was Victorian opulence at its peak—an expression of a highly confident and prosperous age that would never be quite repeated on any other ship. All the first-class public rooms, and the en-suite staterooms of the upper deck, were generally heavily panelled, in oak, satinwood or mahogany; and thickly carpeted. Velvet curtains hung aside the windows and portholes, while the furniture was richly upholstered in matching design. The predominant style was Art Nouveau, although other styles were also in use, such as "French Renaissance" which was applied to the forward first-class entrance hall, whilst the 1st class smoking room was in "Elizabethan style", comprising heavy oak panels surrounding the first open fireplace ever to be used aboard a passenger liner.
Perhaps the finest room in the vessels was the first class dining saloon, over 10' (3.05 m) high and measuring 98' (30 m) long by 63' (19.2 m) wide. Over the central part of this room was a well that rose through three decks to a skylight. It was done in a style described as "modified Italian style", with the a coffered ceiling in white and gold, supported by ionic pillars. The panelled walls were done in Spanish mahogany, inlaid with ivory and richly carved with pilasters and decorations.
Maritime historian Basil Greenhill, in his book Merchant Steamships felt that the interiors of Lucania and Campania represented the ultimate expression of the Victorian age, and remarked that later vessels' interiors degenerated into "grandiose vulgarity, the classical syntax debased to mere jargon".